I've gone through many computers, from Avocet 20s to Echos, Sigmas, and most recently, a Polar 100CS. Then I got it into my head that I wanted two things: 1) No computer on the bike, and 2) Location data.
After some research, I decided to try a Garmin Forerunner 305. First, this thing is not unobtrusive -- I tell people it's a court-mandated tracking bracelet, when they ask, and they do ask. But, feature-wise, it keeps track of the things I want:
- Speed and distance
- Ground track
- Altitude (GPS-derived)
- Heartrate data
- Laps
- Multiple workouts
And it offers a reasonably easy to navigate interface. I've been using the Garmin since December, and here are a few observations:
- The GPS receiver works well; the connection with satellites is typically excellent
- Distance and speed tracking appear to be very accurate -- better than the Polar
- Same with heartrate tracking -- I never have the weird glitches in measurement that I had with the Polar
- I don't notice the unit on my wrist. It's bigger than I would like, but I never notice it when riding
- If I do want to glance at the display, it's easy to read. Legibility it excellent.
The Forerunner 305 allows me to download data for analysis. I started by ditching the Garmin Training Center software -- it's terrible. MotionBased.com is an option, if you want to pay a subscription fee to access all your data. Me, I use it as a backup but that's about it.
Instead, I use the excellent Ascent from Montobello Software. After syncing the 305 with Ascent, I can look at the data in a variety of ways:
- A summary of data
- A graph with speed, elevation and heartrate overlays
- A map with speed, elevation and heartrate overlays
I suspect that I'm only scratching the surface with Ascent, but I've been impressed with the ease of use, excellent and intuitive interface, and presentation of data. If you're buying a Garmin GPS for cycling, budget a few more bucks to license Ascent. It's worth it.

